Stubborn Obstructionism, oh really?

So President Bush now has to nominate a new United States Ambassador to the United Nations, since the newly minted Senate (come January 2007) will absolutely refuse to confirm John Bolton as the American representative to the U.N.

Anyone surprised?

The Republican-controlled Senate refused to confirm Bolton some 18 months ago, and the President insisted on giving him a "recess" appointment anyway.

So who is the "stubborn obstructionist" in this matter?

It's not the Senate, that's for sure. Those fine men and women did their job in refusing to advise and consent to a nomination in which they vehemently disagreed.

I said it then, and I say it again now, "Mr President, send a worthy nominee to the Senate for confirmation." It's time to stop playing the ideological games, and to send a qualified, confirmable candidate to the United States Senate for confirmation as Ambassador of this great nation.

There are plenty of qualified people out there.

And, even though he did an admirable job in his time at the U.N., Mr. Bolton, overall, was not one of them.

Send a good candidate, and please hurry.

No comments: